Orbital floor fractures are repaired through an incision that has to be hidden, and the transconjunctival approach hides it completely, inside the lower eyelid. It has largely replaced the skin incisions that left a visible scar. What it did not remove is the eyelid afterwards pulling out of position: turning in, turning out, sitting low enough to show white below the iris, or retracting. Surgeons disagree about which version of the same approach causes least of that. The incision can pass in front of the septum or behind it, and a lateral canthotomy can be added for access or left out. Most published comparisons set the whole approach against a skin incision, which answers a question surgeons have already settled among themselves. This project stays inside the transconjunctival approach and reads what has been published on its variants, with the eyelid judged at three months or later, late enough that the early swelling has gone. What you get out of it is papers, a table of studies, and a section of the manuscript with your name on it.
Read up on how an orbital floor fracture is repaired and what can go wrong with the eyelid afterwards. Take one part of the comparison, read the papers gathered for it, tabulate the studies, and write that section.
You apply with your university account: your CV and a motivation letter written on the platform.
Sign in to apply